Effective July 1, 2019 all county recorder offices in Arizona have a uniform fee schedule for deed and affidavit recording. The new fee is $30 and it includes the return postage fee.
Recently a past client informed me that his NFA gun trust document, which I drafted, was kicked back to him by an ATF examiner. The issue resulted from a novel interpretation of who the document identified as "responsible persons" under the trust. My first response was to find out whether any rules had changed that I did not know about. Although I confirmed there have been no rule changes since 2016, I did learn that ATF counsel was taking a new, stricter approach to the definition of responsible person for a trust. Although my client's situation was perhaps just an anomaly due to an overzealous examiner, I used this opportunity to carefully review and edit the software templates I use when drafting NFA gun trusts. The updated document tightens the wording in a few key provisions in order to eliminate the offending language. While I disagree with the ATF's interpretation, I also want to minimize the possibility of ATF examiners kicking back a Form 4 to a past client of mine. My update also includes a minor change in wording to the trustee declaration form and to the provisions allowing for appointment of a trust protector.
If you are a past client who wants to update your trust document to include my recent changes, please contact me.
Today the House of Representatives passed legislation that would affect IRA distribution rules. The key change that affects estate planning is the provision that would limit the duration of post-death required minimum distributions to 10 years for most non-spouse beneficiaries.
I will continue to monitor whether the bill passes the Senate and gets the President's signature. The bill has bipartisan support, so it is definitely something to pay attention to.
Summary: Arizona does not permit self-settled asset protection trusts, but an alternative exists.
An asset protection trust is created when a person called a trustor transfers ownership of an asset into an irrevocable trust, which is managed by a trustee for benefit of one or more beneficiaries. The assets you contribute to an irrevocable trust are generally protected from your future or unknown creditors. The catch is that you cannot name yourself as both trustee and beneficiary like you would normally in a revocable living trust for probate avoidance. In other words, you cannot self-settle your own irrevocable asset protection trust and retain the ability to make distributions back to yourself. This arrangement does not provide any asset protection and is against public policy in all 50 states.
However, approximately 16 states now permit self-settled asset protection trusts in some variation. The most well-known are Alaska, Nevada, Wyoming, South Dakota, and Delaware. Unfortunately, the full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution makes it unlikely an Arizona court would respect the governing law of a self-settled asset protection trust established in one of these states for an Arizona resident. Foreign asset protection trusts avoid this problem in theory, but if the full protection of the trust is triggered by an actual threat, case law has shown the beneficiary also loses access to the trust assets unless willing to move permanently outside of the United States. This is an unintended consequence most people are not willing to accept.
Although Arizona law does not permit self-settled asset protection trusts, an Arizona trustor may still obtain the desired creditor protection by establishing the trust in Arizona, excluding the trustor as an eligible beneficiary, and relying on spendthrift provisions to protect the trust assets from creditors of the eligible beneficiaries.
This type of irrevocable trust may be referred to as a hybrid asset protection trust because it may be drafted to include a provision giving an independent person or company called a trust protector the power to move the trust to another state or country that permits self-settled asset protection trusts. This change of governing law might permit the trust protector to add you as an eligible beneficiary later.
For persons dying in 2019 the federal estate tax exemption is now $11,400,000.
Today I revised my brief article summarizing what debts the survivors are responsible for after a death in Arizona.
Arizona Law Update for Living Trusts
The Arizona law permitting use of a Certification of Trust when dealing with financial institutions was amended effective August 3. Now A.R.S. 14-11013(E) says a third party may not demand a copy of the entire trust document (including the dispositive provisions) without first providing a verified statement stating a good faith reason for the demand.
Also, A.R.S. 14-11013(H) makes the third party liable for damages, costs, expenses, and attorney fees if a court determines the request was not made in good faith or did not comply with subsection E.
The public policy behind the law (enacted in 2008) is to allow for privacy of personal financial information. Bouman Law Firm provides an up-to-date certification of trust to every client establishing a revocable living trust.
The Arizona legislature recently amended the law on Certification of Trusts (A.R.S. 14-11013). Two things to know:
1. When a Trustee provides a Certification of Trust to a financial institution, it may not require the Trustee to provide copies of excerpts from the trust document that contain dispositive provisions (i.e., who gets what) or successor Trustee names (i.e., who will manage the trust upon death of Trustor) unless the financial institution also provides a verified statement that states a reasonable basis for the request.
2. A financial institution is now liable for damages, costs, expenses, and attorney fees if a court determines that it did not act in good faith or did not comply with the need for a verified statement in demanding a copy of the trust document.
In summary, the law change reinforces the legislature's intent to simplify the process of doing business with a trust. When buying or selling property using a trust, or opening or re-titling an account into a trust, a Trustee should only have to provide a copy of the Certification of Trust and not the entire document. Financial institutions that still request a copy of the entire trust document are acting unreasonably and, in some cases, against the law.
See Arizona SB 1204, signed March 29, 2018 by Governor Ducey
Summary: Increase in federal estate tax exemption affects testamentary powers of appointment.
If your estate plan includes an inheritance protection trust for a child or other beneficiary, the provision likely gives the beneficiary a testamentary power of appointment. This permits the beneficiary, effective upon the beneficiary’s death, to redirect any remaining trust assets among individuals or charities of the beneficiary’s choice. When avoiding estate tax is a major concern, it makes sense to limit the power of appointment in a manner that restricts the beneficiary from using trust assets to pay off personal debts. This allows trust assets to pass to the successor beneficiaries free of estate tax, which is important for large estates. But the limited power of appointment also prevents the successor beneficiary from getting a step-up in income tax basis, which can increase capital gains tax upon sale of trust assets.
The current estate tax exemption, now dramatically higher than it was in 2017, eliminates the estate tax as a planning issue for all but the very wealthy. This means it makes more sense to refrain from using limited powers of appointment in inheritance trusts. Why? The reason is because the value of potentially avoiding estate tax is outweighed by the more likely benefit of reducing income tax.
The default law in Arizona leaves inheritance outright and free of trust. However, if the beneficiary is incapacitated or under age 21, the Personal Representative or Trustee, as the case may be, will have discretion to distribute inheritance by any one or more of the following methods:
Option #1 Hold in temporary inheritance trust for beneficiary with all remaining assets distributed outright when beneficiary attains  years of age.
Option #2 Hold in temporary inheritance trust for beneficiary with assets distributed in stages by age. For example, 1/3 of trust assets at age , 1/2 of remaining assets at age , and all remaining assets at age .
Option #3 Hold in temporary inheritance trust for beneficiary with assets distributed in stages by time. For example, 1/3 of trust assets immediately, 1/2 of remaining assets  years later, and all remaining assets  years later.
Option #4 Hold in permanent inheritance trust for beneficiary with assets managed by an independent or professional trustee. For example, a trust for mentally-disabled adult beneficiary or beneficiary with substance abuse problems.
Option #5 Hold in permanent inheritance trust for beneficiary, but permit beneficiary to serve as trustee at any time after attaining age  or to name an independent trustee of the beneficiary’s choice.
For more information about inheritance protection trusts, check out this article.
Thomas J. Bouman